Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of positionof a prosthetic cup
Ta. Eddine et al., Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of positionof a prosthetic cup, SUR RAD AN, 23(2), 2001, pp. 105-110
The position of the acetabular implant plays a dominant role in the displac
ement of a total hip prosthesis. CT allows precise measurement of the posit
ion of the cup, but the influence of pelvic rotation on this measurement is
unknown. The aim of this study was to determine, in a group of healthy sub
jects, whether a pelvic equilibrium exists specific to each individual, and
whether this is constant over time on the one hand and between the standin
g and lying positions on the other. The study concerned 15 men and 9 women
with a mean age of 31 years. Each subject had strictly lateral radiographs
of the pelvis, lying and standing, repeated at two different times. Pelvic
version was measured in these radiographs. Each individual had a pelvic pos
ition constant over time, both in the lying and standing positions, However
. there were important variations of the position of the pelvis during pass
age From the lying to the standing position: 22 patients had retroversion o
f the pelvis by a mean of 7 degrees (2-18 degrees) and 2 others had an ante
version of 3 degrees. These major variations of the pelvic position between
the standing and lying positions explain why CT studies made in the lying
position do not allow for the anteversion of the cup in the standing positi
on, which is close to the dynamic situation during which displacement may o
ccur. Thus, an excessive anteversion of the cup may be masked when the scan
is made in the lying position, since in this position the anteversion of t
he pelvis leads to retroversion of the cup. The error may reach 20 degrees,
so that we recommend that CT measurements made without allowing for the po
sition of the pelvis should be interpreted with caution.