EVALUATION OF MULTIMODAL HYDRAULIC FUNCTIONS IN CHARACTERIZING A HETEROGENEOUS FIELD SOIL

Soil water retention curves are often used to estimate the hydraulic c onductivity function. Unfortunately, single S-shaped functions cannot adequately describe water retention curves of structured soil, especia lly near saturation. The approach of superposition of two or more unim odal retention functions such as the van Genuchten model was used here to describe retention data of a macroporous soil. A total of 180 core s, 0.05 m diameter and 0.051 m long, were sampled along a 31-m-long tr ansect in three overlying soil horizons. Use of unimodal retention cur ves leads to an underestimation of observed water contents both near s aturation and in the midpore range, while an overestimation is found i n the drier range. Superposition of two unimodal retention curves sign ificantly improved the estimation over the entire pressure range. Howe ver, the predictions were still not ideal near saturation, With three unimodal curves, a perfect fit was obtained from saturation to residua l water content, Most of the multimodal parameter values were moderate ly heterogeneous along the transect, with the surface horizon slightly more heterogeneous than the deeper layers. The coefficient of variati on (CV) for multimodal parameters was generally in the range of 20 to 70%. Use of the multimodal van Genuchten model with the conductivity e stimation model of Mualem resulted in conductivities that were general ly much smaller than those estimated by the classical unimodal van Gen uchten-Mualem model. A preliminary evaluation of the estimated bimodal and trimodal unsaturated hydraulic conductivity model was based on a comparison with independent conductivity measurements using a combinat ion of crust test, hot-air method, and an unsteady drainage flux exper iment on large columns. The crust and hot-air data compared best with the estimated trimodal conductivity function. The unsteady drainage da ta did not match well with the crust and hot-air data and could not be described with any of the estimated conductivity functions.