Methods by which patients can artificially produce raised peak flow measure
ments have been described. We recently observed a patient manipulating the
peak flow meter in a way that had not been described before. A study was th
erefore undertaken to determine if this technique could repeatedly produce
clinically significant changes in peak flow readings. Fifteen adults, using
a mini-Wright peak flow meter, made five measurements using the correct te
chnique followed by five manipulated measurements under observation. Signif
icant increases in peak flow measurements were observed in 14 of the 15 sub
jects. The mean increase in peak flow rate using the incorrect technique wa
s 56% (range -4% to 86%). Clinicians should be aware that patients might em
ploy this technique to manipulate measurements which could have consequence
s for management.