The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the U,S
, Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) recently cosponsored the Endoc
rine Disrupters Low-Dose Peer Review. The purpose of this meeting was to ex
amine data supporting the presence or absence of low-dose effects of endocr
ine disrupters in specific studies and then to evaluate the likelihood and
significance of these and/or other potential low-dose effects for humans. A
ll invited speakers agreed to provide their raw data in advance of the meet
ing to a Statistics Subpanel, which was asked to reevaluate the authors' ex
perimental design, data analysis, and interpretation of experimental result
s, The purpose of this statistical reevaluation was to provide an independe
nt assessment of the experimental design and data analysis used in each of
the studies and to identify key statistical issues relevant to the evaluati
on and interpretation of the data. This paper presents a summary of the Sta
tistics Subpanel's evaluation. Specific examples are presented to illustrat
e problems that arose in the experimental design and data analysis of certa
in studies, The statistical principles and issues that are discussed in thi
s paper are not unique to endocrine disrupter studies and should provide im
portant guidelines regarding appropriate experimental design and statistica
l analysis for other types of laboratory investigations.