We examined whether participants instructed to reenter a hypnotic state as
part of the posthypnotic suggestion (PHS) show less decay in responding ove
r an 8-week period than participants who do not receive such instructions.
We also attempted to replicate Trussell, Kurtz, and Strube's (1996) finding
on impact of difficulty level. of suggestion on response curve. Fifty-nine
highly susceptible participants were selected by the Stanford Hypnotic Sus
ceptibility Scale: Form C (SHSS:C) and were assigned to one of four groups
(two levels of Difficulty [easy-hard] x two levels of Condition [hypnotic P
HS, non-hypnotic PHS]). Participants were tested for PHS at 1, 3, 6, and 8
weeks. A 2 x 2 x 4 (Difficulty x Condition x Time) factorial ANOVA was cond
ucted, with Time as a repeated-measure. The outcome variable at each time w
as either pass or fail for relevant suggestion. None of the effects contain
ing Condition as a term were significant indicating there is no advantage t
o using Berrigan, Kurtz, Stabile, and Strube's (1991) atypical induction te
chnique to influence the durability of PHS. We found a significant Time eff
ect but failed to replicate Trussell et al.'s findings for Difficulty level
. The differing results found in these three recent studies (Berrigan et al
., Trussell et al., and the current study) suggest the effects for durabili
ty of PHS may be quite fragile in spite of rigorous experimental controls u
sed in all three studies.