Dw. Yu et Hb. Wilson, The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; Long live the competition-colonization trade-off, AM NATURAL, 158(1), 2001, pp. 49-63
When applied at the individual patch level, the classic competition-coloniz
ation models of species coexistence assume that propagules of superior comp
etitors can displace adults of inferior competitors (displacement competiti
on). But if adults are invulnerable to displacement by propagules (as trees
are to seeds), and propagules compete to replace adults that die for reaso
ns independent of the outcome of juvenile competition (a lottery system), a
competition-colonization trade-off alone is not able to produce coexistenc
e. However, we show that coexistence is possible if patch density varies sp
atially, such that it becomes a niche axis. We also show how a dispersal-fe
cundity trade-off can partition variation in patch density. We discuss the
application of these models to empirical systems. An important implication
of communities coexisting via variation in patch density is that the amount
of habitat loss necessarily interacts with the pattern of loss in affectin
g extinctions, invasions, and coexistence, in contrast to displacement comp
etition models, for which the spatial pattern of loss is not important or i
s less important. Finally, with respect to mechanisms promoting coexistence
, we suggest that trade-offs between different stages of colonization could
be far more common in nature than a trade-off between competitive ability
and colonization ability.