Differences in the responses of plant species to neighbors may determine th
eir distribution among contrasting environments, but no studies have compar
ed variation in competitive or facilitative abilities both within and among
environments. We determined whether the responses of plants to interspecif
ic interactions varied at large scales (between environments) and small sca
les (among sites within an environment) across a tree line. We separated th
e effects of above- and belowground interactions on seedlings of grasses an
d trees grown in prairie or forest using vegetation removals at several sit
es. Species interactions generally had no significant effect on transplant
survival. Competition reduced seedling growth by about 33%-89% in both prai
rie and forest environments. Despite the strong suppression of growth by ne
ighbors, environment and species effects contributed more to variation in t
ransplant performance than did neighbor removals. Responses to neighbors va
ried among transplant species but generally did not vary significantly betw
een environments or among sites. With vegetation removed, grasses grew sign
ificantly faster in prairie and trees grew faster in forest. Thus, in the a
bsence of neighbors, species showed distinct preferences for the environmen
t in which they are most abundant. In summary, the responses of grasses and
woody species to neighbors did not vary significantly at either large (bet
ween environments) or small (among sites) scales. These results suggest tha
t species responses to interspecific interactions do not vary strongly with
environment or smaller-scale site effects.