El. Smith et al., BINOCULAR SPATIAL PHASE TUNING CHARACTERISTICS OF NEURONS IN THE MACAQUE STRIATE CORTEX, Journal of neurophysiology, 78(1), 1997, pp. 351-365
We employed microelectrode recording techniques to study the sensitivi
ty of individual neurons in the striate cortex of anesthetized and par
alyzed monkeys to relative interocular image disparities and to determ
ine the effects of basic stimulus parameters on these cortical binocul
ar interactions. The visual stimuli were drifting sine wave gratings.
After the optimal stimulus orientation, spatial frequency, and directi
on of stimulus movement were found, the cells' disparity tuning charac
teristics were determined by measuring responses as a function of the
relative interocular spatial phase of dichoptic grating pairs. No atte
mpts were made to assess absolute position disparities or horizontal d
isparities relative to the horopter. The majority (similar to 70%) of
simple cells were highly sensitive to interocular spatial phase dispar
ities, particularly neurons with balanced ocular dominances. Simple ce
lls typically demonstrated binocular facilitation at the optimal phase
disparity and binocular suppression for disparities 180 degrees away.
Fewer complex cells were phase selective (similar to 40%); however, t
he range of disparity selectivity in phase-sensitive complex cells was
comparable with that for simple cells. Binocular interactions in non-
phase-sensitive complex cells were evidenced by binocular response amp
litudes that differed from responses to monocular stimulation. The deg
ree of disparity tuning was independent of a cell's optimal orientatio
n or the degree of direction tuning. However, disparity-sensitive cell
s tended to have narrow orientation tuning functions and the degree of
disparity tuning was greatest for the optimal stimulus orientations.
Rotating the stimulus for one eye 90 degrees from the optimal orientat
ion usually eliminated binocular interactions. The effects of phase di
sparities on the binocular response amplitude were also greatest at th
e optimal spatial frequency. Thus a cell's sensitivity to absolute pos
ition disparities reflects its spatial tuning characteristics, with ce
lls sensitive to high spatial frequencies being capable of signaling v
ery small changes in image disparity. On the other hand, stimulus cont
rast had relatively little effect on a cell's disparity tuning, becaus
e response saturation occurred at the same contrast level for all rela
tive interocular phase disparities. Thus, as with orientation tuning,
a cell's optimal disparity and the degree of disparity selectivity wer
e invariant with contrast. Overall, the results show that sensitivity
to interocular spatial phase disparities is a common property of stria
te neurons. A cell's disparity tuning characteristics appear to largel
y reflect its monocular receptive field properties and the interocular
balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs. However, distinct f
unctional classes of cortical neurons could not be discriminated on th
e basis of disparity sensitivity alone.