Analgesic efficacy and safety of nefopam vs. propacetamol following hepatic resection

Citation
O. Mimoz et al., Analgesic efficacy and safety of nefopam vs. propacetamol following hepatic resection, ANAESTHESIA, 56(6), 2001, pp. 520-525
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANAESTHESIA
ISSN journal
00032409 → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
520 - 525
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2409(200106)56:6<520:AEASON>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
In order to compare the morphine-sparing effect, analgesic efficacy and tol erance of nefopam and propacetamol given at their highest recommended doses , 120 patients undergoing elective hepatic resection were randomly assigned to receive postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with mor phine alone, or in combination with nefopam (20 mg.4 h(-1)) or propacetamol (2 g.6 h(-1)). Compared with the control group (43 [7-92] mg), median [ran ge] cumulative morphine consumption for 24 h after the study started was ha lved in the nefopam group (21 [3-78] mg, p < 0.001) and 20% lower in the pr opacetamol group (35 [6-84] mg, p = 0.15). Analgesia was superior in the ne fopam group despite the lower morphine consumption. Adverse effects were co mparable in the three groups, except for significantly more nausea in the c ontrol group (39% vs. 17 and 26% in the nefopam and propacetamol groups, re spectively) and more sweating in the nefopam group (17% vs. 0 and 3% in the control and propacetamol groups, respectively). Overall patient satisfacti on was better (p < 0.001) in patients given nefopam (97%) than those receiv ing morphine alone (82%) or propacetamol (74%).