Ma. Conditt et al., THE MOTOR SYSTEM DOES NOT LEARN THE DYNAMICS OF THE ARM BY ROTE MEMORIZATION OF PAST EXPERIENCE, Journal of neurophysiology, 78(1), 1997, pp. 554-560
The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning mechanisms u
nderlying motor adaptation of ann movements to externally applied pert
urbing forces. We considered two alternative hypotheses. According to
one, adaptation occurs through the learning of a mapping between the s
lates (positions and velocities) visited by the arm and the forces exp
erienced at those states. The alternative hypothesis is that adaptatio
n occurs through the memorization of the temporal sequence of forces e
xperienced along specific trajectories. The first mechanism correspond
s to developing a model of the dynamics of the environment, whereas th
e second is a form of ''rote learning.'' Both types of learning would
lead to the recovery of the unperturbed performance. We have tested th
ese hypotheses by examining how adaptation is transferred across diffe
rent types of movements. Our results indicate that 1) adaptation to an
externally applied force field occurs with different classes of movem
ents Including but not limited to reaching movements and 2) adaptation
generalizes across different movements that visit the same regions of
the external field. These findings are not compatible with the hypoth
esis of rote learning. Instead, they are consistent with the hypothesi
s that adaptation to changes in movement dynamics is achieved by a mod
ule that learns to reproduce the structure of the environmental field
as an association between visited states and experienced forces, indep
endent of the kinematics of the movements made during adaptation.