T. Petit et al., Systematic esophageal endoscopy screening in patients previously treated for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, ANN ONCOL, 12(5), 2001, pp. 643-646
Background: An attempt was made to improve metachronous oesophageal cancer
prognosis through bi-annual systematic esophageal endoscopy screening in pa
tients treated for head and neck cancer.
Patients and methods: Bi-annual esophageal endoscopy, without a staining pr
ocedure, was performed in 1560 patients from 1987 to 1997. The distribution
of previous head and neck cancer was oral cavity (20%), oropharynx (30%),
hypopharynx (34%), and larynx (16%). All patients had initial panendoscopic
inspection before HNSCC treatment. Esophageal tumors were considered to be
second synchronous primaries when discovered within the first six months o
f initial tumor diagnosis.
Results: Fifty metachronous esophageal asymptomatic cancers (42 T-1 and 7 i
n situ carcinomas) were diagnosed by endoscopy. The median time between the
HNC and the esophageal carcinoma was 43 months (7-137 months). Metachronou
s esophageal carcinoma was discovered in 2.6% of patients with oral cavity
tumor, 5.7% of patients with oropharynx tumor, 2.3% of patients with hypoph
arynx tumor, and 1.7% of patients with larynx tumor. Causes of death were:
41.1% related to esophageal tumor with tumor progression, metastatic evolut
ion, or treatment toxicity; 28.9% related to non malignant causes; 26.6% re
lated to a cancer that was not of esophageal origin.
Conclusions: Over a 10-year period, systematic bi-annual esophageal endosco
py uncovered metachronous esophageal tumors in 3.2% of 1560 patients origin
ally treated for head and neck carcinoma, developing in a median time of 47
months. Patients with initial oropharyngeal tumors had a significantly hig
her risk of metachronous esophageal SCC, compared to the other tumor sites
(P < 0.02 with Fisher exact test). Given the elevated death rate not relate
d to the esophageal cancer and the median survival of 16 months, any potent
ial benefit from this time-consuming procedure is debatable.