F. Stephan et al., Clinical evaluation of circulating blood volume in critically ill patients- contribution of a clinical scoring system, BR J ANAEST, 86(6), 2001, pp. 754-762
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The circulating blood volume (CBV) of critically ill patients may be diffic
ult to estimate on the basis of history and physical examination. The aim o
f this study was to evaluate the ability of seven clinical signs and centra
l venous pressure (CVP) to predict CBV in critically ill patients; CBV was
evaluated with the [I-125]human serum albumin technique. A scoring system w
as constructed using a combination of independence Bayes method and logisti
c regression. Sixty-eight patients constituted a 'model development' sample
and 30 patients a validation sample. Thirty-six patients (53%) in the mode
l development sample were found to have a low CBV (measured CBV at least 10
% lower than the predicted mean normal CBV). Neither the haemodynamic varia
bles monitored in ICU, nor the spot urinary sodium concentrations were diff
erent between patients with and without a low CBV. Individually, none of th
e clinical signs tested have a good positive or negative predictive value.
For CVP, only extreme values seem to have clinical significance. To constru
ct the score, the signs tested were ranked according to their discriminatin
g efficacy. The probability of a low CBV was obtained by adding the weights
of each sign tested and converting the score obtained into a probability.
On a validation sample of 30 patients, the predictions are reliable as asse
ssed by Z statistics ranging between -2 and +2. Our results suggest that: (
1) individually, no clinical sign presented a clinical useful predictive va
lue; and (2) a clinical scoring system may be helpful for the evaluation of
CBV in critically ill patients.