S. Soltesz et al., Recovery after remifentanil and sufentanil for analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated patients after trauma or major surgery, BR J ANAEST, 86(6), 2001, pp. 763-768
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We investigated the analgesic effect and the neurological recovery time aft
er administration of remifentanil in mechanically ventilated patients in an
intensive care unit. Twenty patients, after trauma or major surgery with n
o intracranial pathology, were randomized to receive either remifentanil/pr
opofol (n=10) or sufentanil/propofol (n=10). A sedation score and a simplif
ied pain score were used to assess adequate sedation and analgesia. Medicat
ion was temporarily stopped after 24 h. Immediately before and 10 and 30 mi
n after, the degree of sedation and pain score were evaluated. Adequate ana
lgesia and sedation was achieved with remifentanil 10.6 mug kg(-1) h(-1) an
d propofol 2.1 mg kg(-1) h(-1), or sufentanil 0.5 mug kg(-1) h(-1) and prop
ofol 1.3 mg kg(-1) h(-1). The difference in propofol dose between groups wa
s significant. Ten minutes after terminating the medication, the degree of
sedation decreased significantly after remifentanil and all patients could
follow simple commands. During the following 20 min, all patients with remi
fentanil emerged from sedation and complained of considerable pain. By cont
rast, in the sufentanil group, only six (7) responded to commands after 10
(30) min and their pain score remained essentially unchanged during the 30-
min observation period. We conclude that, in contrast to sufentanil, remife
ntanil facilitates rapid emergence from analgesia and sedation, allowing a
clinical neurological examination within 10-30 min in mechanically ventilat
ed patients with no intracranial pathology.