Judgments of personal autonomy and interpersonal responsibility in the context of Indian spousal relationships: An examination of young people's reasoning in Mysore, India
Kd. Neff, Judgments of personal autonomy and interpersonal responsibility in the context of Indian spousal relationships: An examination of young people's reasoning in Mysore, India, BR J DEV PS, 19, 2001, pp. 233-257
This study examined social judgments of autonomy and responsibility in the
context of Indian spousal relationships. The sample included 72 Hindu India
n children, adolescents and young adults (M ages = 10.2, 15.1 and 19.8 year
s) from Mysore, India. Participants were presented with a series of vignett
es in which the needs and desires of spouses conflicted, designed so that t
he protagonist in each situation was either a husband or wife. Participants
were asked to decide what the actor should do and why, indicating whether
personal autonomy or interpersonal responsibility concerns were dominant. A
repeated measures MANOVA found a main effect of spousal condition, indicat
ing that judgments were influenced by norms of patriarchy: autonomy was emp
hasized more often for husbands, responsibility more often for wives (parti
cularly among male children). However, participants also went against cultu
ral norms, with 58% of participants supporting autonomy for wives when thei
r personal concerns were relatively important. Although Hindu India is ofte
n described as a collectivistic culture in which personal concerns are subo
rdinated to interpersonal concerns, the Hindu Indian participants in this s
tudy displayed concern with both autonomy and responsibility, and gender hi
erarchy played a role in the manifestation of these concerns.