Loss of heterozygosity and allelic imbalance in tumors are usually detected
by either radioactive labeling of PCR products with subsequent scoring of
autoradiographs or by a semi-quantitative fluorescence-based protocol. Poly
morphic microsatellite loci are the most common marker type used in these s
tudies. Even though no consensus exists as to how to evaluate such data, re
sults are often compared directly between studies applying the two differen
t protocols. In the present study, we analyzed twice by each protocol three
loci in 60 blood/tumor pairs, finding good correlation between the results
obtained by the two methods. However, a higher sensitivity and the possibi
lity to correct for stutter peaks were among several advantages inherent in
the fluorescence labeling approach. In addition, we determined the cut-off
level for allelic imbalance scoring by the fluorescent primer protocol. by
repeated analysis of 485 constitutional heterozygous genotypes at 20 diffe
rent dinucleotide repeat loci. Based on the standard deviation, we found th
at allelic imbalance should be scored whenever the peak height of one allel
e in tumor DNA is reduced to loss than 0.84 of its value in constitutional
DNA, relative to the other allele. Applying this cut-off value, more imbala
nces are detected than by the visual scoring of autoradiographs. Our data t
herefore suggest that a lower threshold value (0.75) must be used when resu
lts from both fluorescent and radioactive assays are compared. (C) 2001 Els
evier Science Ins. All rights reserved.