The application of the FAO and US soil taxonomy systems to saline soils inrelation to halophytic vegetation in SE Spain

Citation
Ja. Rogel et al., The application of the FAO and US soil taxonomy systems to saline soils inrelation to halophytic vegetation in SE Spain, CATENA, 45(1), 2001, pp. 73-84
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
CATENA
ISSN journal
03418162 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
73 - 84
Database
ISI
SICI code
0341-8162(20010801)45:1<73:TAOTFA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Twenty-three pedons from six salt marshes in SE Spain, occurring under a se miarid Mediterranean climate, were classified according to various FAO and USDA Soil Survey Staff (SSS) systems. In each salt marsh, the sampling site s were selected to represent seven different plant communities. For the pla nt communities studied, less diversity of soil classes was observed at the Unit level using the 1998 version of the FAO soil classification system tha n the 1994 edition and less at the Great Group level for the 1996, 1998 and 1999 versions of the USDA system than the 1992 version. The FAO 1988 versi on defines the characteristics of these soils better than the 1994 edition because the former includes the possibilities of classifying at the third l evel and of using salic and sodic phases. The 1998 version offers greater p ossibilities for expressing the characteristics of these soils, but two con siderations would improve the results: (i) the use of the term Hyposalic in stead of Endosalic in the Calcisols group: (ii) the possibility of using th e petrocalcic horizon in the Solonchak group. The main shortcomings of the 1996 and 1998 versions of the USDA system for classifying these soils are: (i) the lack of a class to indicate a high concentration of salts in the Mo llisol Order independently of the presence of a natric horizon and/or aquic conditions; (ii) failure to indicate the existence of a petrocalcic horizo n at the Salids Great Group level. These two problems can be overcome in th e 1999 version by the use of the adjectives Halic and Petrocalcic, respecti vely. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.