D. Giannini et al., Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge canbe partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol regular treatment, CHEST, 119(6), 2001, pp. 1671-1675
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objective: To assess whether the withdrawal of salmeterol treatment f
or 3 days (72 h) can restore its bronchoprotective ability on specific bron
chial provocative test (sBPT) with allergen, which was completely lost afte
r 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol.
Study design: Single-blind design,
Patients and methods: We investigated 10 nonsmoking subjects (8 men and 2 w
omen; mean +/- SD age, 24 +/- 8 years) with mild intermittent allergic asth
ma in the stable phase of the disease, who were never previously treated wi
th regular beta (2)-agonists. Subjects with a previous positive early airwa
y response (EAR) to a screening allergen challenge were considered. They un
derwent sBPT with allergen after a single dose of inhaled salmeterol, 50 mu
g (T-1), and then underwent sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with inh
aled salmeterol, 50 mug bid (T-2); after that, they continued inhaled salme
terol treatment for 4 days, and then changed to inhaled salmeterol with pla
cebo (two puffs bid) for 3 days (72 h) and underwent sBPT with allergen aft
er a single dose of salmeterol, 50 betag (T-3).
Results: EAR to allergen (Delta FEV1 greater than or equal to 20% with resp
ect to postdiluent value) was completely abolished by a single dose of salm
eterol (T-1; protection index [PI] greater than or equal to 50% in all subj
ects), but it was still present after 1 week of regular treatment with salm
eterol (T-2; PI < 50% in all subjects). The maximum FEV, percentage fall du
ring sBPT with allergen was significantly lower after withdrawal of regular
inhaled salmeterol (T-3) than after regular treatment with salmeterol (T-2
) (mean, 23% vs 29.5%; range, 4to 41% vs 18 to 49%, respectively; p < 0.05)
; a similar result was obtained considering the PI of salmeterol on sBPT wi
th allergen (mean, 44% vs 20%; range, 2 to 86% vs - 11 to 49%, respectively
; p <less than> 0.05). However, the maximum FEV1, percentage fall and Pt we
re significantly different in T-3 than after T-1, and only 4 of 10 patients
showed in T-3 a PI greater than or equal to 50%. Conclusions: The bronchop
rotective effect of salmeterol on allergen-induced EAR, completely lost aft
er 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol, may be partially restored b
y the withdrawal of salmeterol therapy for 3 days (72 h), However, this wit
hdrawal time period is not sufficient to recover the baseline bronchoprotec
tive efficacy of the first dose of salmeterol.