Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge canbe partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol regular treatment

Citation
D. Giannini et al., Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge canbe partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol regular treatment, CHEST, 119(6), 2001, pp. 1671-1675
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CHEST
ISSN journal
00123692 → ACNP
Volume
119
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1671 - 1675
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(200106)119:6<1671:TTTPEO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Study objective: To assess whether the withdrawal of salmeterol treatment f or 3 days (72 h) can restore its bronchoprotective ability on specific bron chial provocative test (sBPT) with allergen, which was completely lost afte r 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol. Study design: Single-blind design, Patients and methods: We investigated 10 nonsmoking subjects (8 men and 2 w omen; mean +/- SD age, 24 +/- 8 years) with mild intermittent allergic asth ma in the stable phase of the disease, who were never previously treated wi th regular beta (2)-agonists. Subjects with a previous positive early airwa y response (EAR) to a screening allergen challenge were considered. They un derwent sBPT with allergen after a single dose of inhaled salmeterol, 50 mu g (T-1), and then underwent sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with inh aled salmeterol, 50 mug bid (T-2); after that, they continued inhaled salme terol treatment for 4 days, and then changed to inhaled salmeterol with pla cebo (two puffs bid) for 3 days (72 h) and underwent sBPT with allergen aft er a single dose of salmeterol, 50 betag (T-3). Results: EAR to allergen (Delta FEV1 greater than or equal to 20% with resp ect to postdiluent value) was completely abolished by a single dose of salm eterol (T-1; protection index [PI] greater than or equal to 50% in all subj ects), but it was still present after 1 week of regular treatment with salm eterol (T-2; PI < 50% in all subjects). The maximum FEV, percentage fall du ring sBPT with allergen was significantly lower after withdrawal of regular inhaled salmeterol (T-3) than after regular treatment with salmeterol (T-2 ) (mean, 23% vs 29.5%; range, 4to 41% vs 18 to 49%, respectively; p < 0.05) ; a similar result was obtained considering the PI of salmeterol on sBPT wi th allergen (mean, 44% vs 20%; range, 2 to 86% vs - 11 to 49%, respectively ; p <less than> 0.05). However, the maximum FEV1, percentage fall and Pt we re significantly different in T-3 than after T-1, and only 4 of 10 patients showed in T-3 a PI greater than or equal to 50%. Conclusions: The bronchop rotective effect of salmeterol on allergen-induced EAR, completely lost aft er 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol, may be partially restored b y the withdrawal of salmeterol therapy for 3 days (72 h), However, this wit hdrawal time period is not sufficient to recover the baseline bronchoprotec tive efficacy of the first dose of salmeterol.