Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction - Predicting outcome as a function of management strategy
E. Schwammenthal et al., Dobutamine echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction - Predicting outcome as a function of management strategy, CHEST, 119(6), 2001, pp. 1766-1777
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objective: To prospectively address the question whether the assessme
nt of valvular hemodynamics and myocardial function during low-dose dobutam
ine infusion can guide decision making in patients with aortic stenosis and
left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.
Patients and measurements: Twenty-four patients with aortic stenosis and LV
dysfunction (mean ejection fraction, 28%; New York Heart Association class
, II to IV) were studied by dobutamine echocardiography assessing mean pres
sure gradient, aortic valve area, and aortic valve resistance. Patients wer
e prospectively divided into severe and nonsevere aortic stenosis groups ac
cording to the response of the valve area to the augmentation of systolic f
low. The clinical decision was considered to be concordant with the results
of dobutamine echocardiography, when patients with severe aortic stenosis
and preserved contractile function were referred by a specialist for aortic
valve replacement and when patients with nonsevere aortic stenosis were no
t. Patients were observed for up to 3 years.
Results: Ail eight patients with severe aortic stenosis who were referred f
or surgery survived and had good I cardiovascular outcomes, and six of eigh
t patients who were not initially referred for surgery had poor outcomes, i
ncluding heart failure and sudden cardiac death. The eight patients with no
nsevere aortic stenosis did comparatively well without valve replacement Ca
rdiac death or pulmonary edema occurred in 4 of 16 patients (25%) when the
clinical decision was concordant with the results of the dobutamine echocar
diogram and occurred in 6 of 8 patients (75%) when the clinical decision wa
s discordant (p = 0.019 [chi (2) test]).
Conclusion: Patients with aortic stenosis, LV dysfunction, and relatively l
ow gradients have better outcomes when management decisions are based on th
e results of dobutamine echocardiograms. Those patients identified as havin
g severe aortic stenosis and preserved contractile reserve by dobutamine ec
hocardiography should undergo surgery, while patients identified as having
nonsevere aortic stenosis can be managed conservatively.