Randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole versus ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole for the treatment of severe melioidosis

Citation
P. Chetchotisakd et al., Randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole versus ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole for the treatment of severe melioidosis, CLIN INF D, 33(1), 2001, pp. 29-34
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
10584838 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
29 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(20010701)33:1<29:RDCSOC>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
We conducted a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled study of ce foperazone-sulbactam (ratio, 1:1; cefoperazone 25 mg/kg/day) plus cotrimoxa zole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMZ] at a ratio of 80:400; TMP, 8 mg/kg/day) versus ceftazidime (100 mg/kg/day) plus cotrimoxazole (TMP, 8 mg /kg/day) for the treatment of severe melioidosis. Of 219 patients enrolled in the study, 102 (47%) had culture-proven melioidosis. These patients were assigned randomly to 2 treatment groups, each with 50 patients (2 patients were excluded). Mortality rates were not significantly different between t he 2 groups: 18% in the cefoperazone-sulbactam group versus 14% in the ceft azidime group. The crude difference in the mortality rate was 4%, but when adjusted for type of infection the difference was 0.9% (95% confidence inte rval, -3.6% to 5.4%; P = .696). The duration of defervescence and the bacte riological response of successfully treated patients were similar. in both groups, and both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Cefoperazone-sulba ctam plus cotrimoxazole might be used as an alternative to ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole as treatment for severe melioidosis.