Need for alternative trial designs and evaluation strategies for therapeutic studies of invasive mycoses

Citation
Jh. Rex et al., Need for alternative trial designs and evaluation strategies for therapeutic studies of invasive mycoses, CLIN INF D, 33(1), 2001, pp. 95-106
Citations number
108
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
10584838 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
95 - 106
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(20010701)33:1<95:NFATDA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Studies of invasive fungal infections have been and remain difficult to imp lement. Randomized clinical trials of fungal infections are especially slow and expensive to perform because it is difficult to identify eligible pati ents in a timely fashion, to prove the presence of the fungal infection in an unequivocal fashion, and to evaluate outcome in a convincing fashion. Be cause of these challenges, licensing decisions for antifungal agents have t o date depended heavily on historical control comparisons and secondary adv antages of the new agent. Although the availability of newer and potentiall y more effective agents makes these approaches less desirable, the fundamen tal difficulties of trials of invasive fungal infections have not changed. Therefore, there is a need for alternative trial designs and evaluation str ategies for therapeutic studies of invasive mycoses, and this article summa rizes the possible strategies in this area.