Objective: Many event-related potential (ERP) situations do not fulfill the
multivariate statistics requirement of more cases than measurements. Five
simulation studies were carried to select a sensitive test for comparing tw
o independent groups of ERPs.
Methods: Simulated signal and noise waveforms were generated using differen
t combinations of parameters: cases or replications per group, correlation
between data points, number of points, signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), etc. Th
e false alarm (FA) rate of each method was assessed and their sensitivity c
ompared over sets of 2000 simulated experiments per condition.
Results: Study 1 identified the 'Projection onto Centroids Difference Vecto
rs' (PCDV) method of Haig and Gordon (Brain Topogr 1995;8:67) as very good,
but its FA rate was erratic under several conditions. The following studie
s served to shape the implementation parameters of a version of PCDV, terme
d PCDVp, that assesses significance through random permutations of the case
labels. The final form is very sensitive. For instance, with two groups of
48 trials of 30-point EEG-like waveforms, its power for alpha = 0.05 is ab
out 50% at S/N 1.0 and 90% at S/N 1.5 (amplitude).
Conclusion: PCDVp requires no a priori knowledge and is sensitive to detect
differences between independent sets of waveforms, topographies or spatio-
temporal data. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.