PURPOSE: Preliminary studies ha c e shown improvement in fecal incontinence
in several patients who received temporary or permanent stimulation. The p
urpose of this study was to report our experience in sacral nerve stimulati
on in the treatment of fecal incontinence and to target patients who would
benefit most from stimulation. METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinence we
re studied clinically and manometrically before, during, and after temporar
y nerve stimulation, if temporary nerve stimulation was clinically successf
ul, the patient was implanted and followed up for six months. RESULTS: Nine
patients (G female) with a mean age of 50.7 +/- 12.3 years underwent tempo
rary nerve stimulation. Temporary nerve stimulation was successful in eight
patients, six of whom were implanted. Of the patients who could be evaluat
ed, three of five had improved at the six-month follow-up visit, particular
ly in relation to the number of urgency episodes and delay in postponing de
fecation. ALL implanted patients had urinary symptoms. Urinary urgency was
also improved by stimulation. During temporary nerve stimulation, the maxim
al squeeze pressure amplitude increased. After implantation, only the durat
ion of maximal squeeze pressure seemed to improve. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve
stimulation can be used in the management of fecal incontinence, particula
rly in cases of urge fecal incontinence associated with urinary urgency. Th
is study seems to confirm the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on striate
d sphincter function.