Total pelvic mesh repair - A ten-year experience

Citation
Es. Sullivan et al., Total pelvic mesh repair - A ten-year experience, DIS COL REC, 44(6), 2001, pp. 857-863
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN journal
00123706 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
857 - 863
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(200106)44:6<857:TPMR-A>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This report describes our technique and experience in restori ng the pelvic floor of females with pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: Total p elvic mesh repair uses a strip of Marlex Mesh (R) secured between the perin eal body and the sacrum. Two additional strips, attached to the first, are tunneled laterally to the pubis and support the vagina and bladder laterall y. Candidates for the procedure have failed previous standard repair or man ifest combined organ prolapse on physical and cystodefecography exams. RESU LTS: From January 1990 to December 1999, 236 females had total pelvic mesh repair, and 205 (87 percent) were available for follow-up. Median age was 6 4 (range, 32-89) years, median parity 2 (range, 1-9); 63 percent had birth- related complications. Bladder protrusion, vaginal protrusion, or both were the predominant chief complaint (54 percent), followed by anorectal protru sion (48 percent). Findings on physical examination showed degrees of prola pse of rectum (74 percent) and vagina (57 percent), perineal descent (63 pe rcent), enterocele (47 percent), and rectocele (44 percent). Mean procedure time and length of hospital stay were 3.2 (standard deviation 0.75) hours and G (standard deviation 2.2) days, respectively. Reoperation rate because of complications of the total pelvic mesh repair procedure was 10 percent. Marlex (R) erosion into rectum or vagina occurred in 5 percent of patients and constituted 46 percent of the complications requiring reoperation. Add itional surgical procedures at various intervals subsequent to total pelvic mesh repair have been performed in 36 percent of patients to further impro ve bladder function and have been performed in 28 percent of patients to im prove anorectal function. There has been no recurrence of rectal or vaginal prolapse to date. Reports of overall satisfaction for correction of primar y symptoms for patients grouped into early (0.5-3 years), middle (>3-6 year s) and late (>6 years) were 68 percent, 73 percent, and 74 percent respecti vely. CONCLUSION: Total pelvic mesh repair is a safe and effective operatio n for females with pelvic organ prolapse.