Ignoring a level in a multilevel model: evidence from UK census data

Citation
M. Tranmer et Dg. Steel, Ignoring a level in a multilevel model: evidence from UK census data, ENVIR PL-A, 33(5), 2001, pp. 941-948
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
EnvirnmentalStudies Geografy & Development
Journal title
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A
ISSN journal
0308518X → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
941 - 948
Database
ISI
SICI code
0308-518X(200105)33:5<941:IALIAM>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Because of the inherent multilevel nature of census data, it is often appro priate to use multilevel models to investigate relationships between census variables. For a local population, the data available from the census allo w a three-level nested model to be assumed, with an individual level (level 1), an enumeration district (ED) level (level 2), and a ward level (level 3). The consequences of ignoring one of the three levels in this model are assessed here theoretically. Empirical results, based on 1991 UK Census dat a, are also provided, comparing the variance components estimated from the three-level model with analyses based on models where the ED or ward level are ignored. The results show how the variation that occurs at the level no t included in the models is redistributed to the other levels that the mode ls do include.