Bs. Kasimis et al., A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 2 DIFFERENT DOSAGE REGIMENS OF INTRAVENOUS DOLASETRON IN PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY, Cancer investigation, 15(4), 1997, pp. 304-310
This study compared the antiemetic efficacy and safety of two differen
t intravenous (IV) dolasetron dosing regimens in patients receiving th
eir first course of high-dose (greater than or equal to 80 mg/m(2)) ci
splatin. Of 30 patients enrolled, 14 received a single IV dolasetron d
ose (0.6 mg/kg) before cisplatin and 16 received a multiple IV dose re
gimen (0.6 mg/kg x 3) given before and after cisplatin. Complete plus
major responses were achieved by 71% (10/14) of patients who received
single-dose dolasetron and by 50% (8/16) of those who received the mul
tiple-dose regimen. Forty-three percent (6/14) of patients who receive
d the single dose had a complete response compared with 25% (4/16) who
received multiple doses. Multiple doses resulted in less nausea at 24
hr following cisplatin; however, differences were no statistically si
gnificant. Both regimens were well tolerated, with mild headache (33%)
and diarrhea (13%) the most common adverse events. This study demonst
rated that a single 0.6-mg/kg dose of dolasetron given before chemothe
rapy provides equivalent antiemetic efficacy to three 0.6-mg/kg doses
given before and after high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy; thus, there w
as no additional antiemetic benefit by using the multiple-dose regimen
.