Mj. Langsford et al., The effect of introduction of a guideline on the management of vaginal discharge and in particular bacterial vaginosis in primary care, FAM PRACT, 18(3), 2001, pp. 253-257
Background. Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the commonest cause of vaginal disc
harge, and its association with obstetric and gynaecological complications
is being recognized increasingly. It was our impression that BV was poorly
understood and underdiagnosed in family practice.
Objective. The aim of this study was to explore the management of patients
with vaginal symptoms by family practitioners and to see if the management
changed after the assimilation of best practice guidelines.
Method. Family practitioners were invited to complete a baseline questionna
ire of their perceived practice, and to record actual practice when consult
ed about vaginal symptoms, for a minimum of 4 weeks. Consensus best practic
e guidelines were then provided and practice recorded for a similar period.
Results. Baseline data was received from 34 practitioners and suggested tha
t the symptoms and signs of different vaginal infections were not well know
n. Most symptomatic patients were only investigated at re-presentation with
unresolved symptoms or at recurrence, and 43% of respondents treated with
empirical antifungals as a first line approach. Pregnant patients were only
occasionally asked about symptoms and only occasionally examined if sympto
matic. Preguideline practice data from 30 practitioners showed 1.2 patient
consultations/week, of which 60% were examined and 55% had a high vaginal s
wab (HVS) sent. Only 2% had near-patient tests done. Post-guideline data fr
om 23 family practitioners showed a lower recorded consultation rate at 0.7
/week, but 90% of these were examined, 77% had an HVS sent and 69% had near
-patient tests done. Of the 36 HVS examined by Gram stain, 19 (53%) showed
Lacrobacillus predominant flora and 10 (28%) suggested BV. Seven (19%) were
borderline or ungradable. Only three (8%) showed yeasts, one of which also
showed BV.
Conclusions. Baseline data supported our impression that BV was under-recog
nized, Guidelines appeared to improve the rate of investigation of women co
nsulting with vaginal symptoms.