Aj. Nordin et al., Do elderly cancer patients care about cure? Attitudes to radical gynecologic oncology surgery in the elderly, GYNECOL ONC, 81(3), 2001, pp. 447-455
Objective. The aim of this study was to address the hypothesis of no differ
ence between elderly and younger patients' desire for optimal surgery and d
isease cure.
Methods. The new ARGOSE questionnaire with established instruments was admi
nistered to 189 gynecologic cancer patients (95 aged < 65, 57 aged 65-74, a
nd 37 aged 75+ years).
Results. Disease diagnosis differed between the < 65 years and 65+ years co
horts (P < 0,001), but treatment modalities were similar (P = 0,28), Influe
nces of family and friends and past experiences of cancer had little influe
nce on treatment decisions. There was no difference between cohorts in desi
re for surgery offering a chance of disease cure (P = 0,75), except that th
e elderly desire cure more if treatment is associated with disfigurement th
an do the young. (P = 0.029). The elderly believe more strongly than the yo
ung that the elderly value cure (P < 0.001). Issues of sexuality and femini
nity associated with gynecologic cancer and treatment are more important to
younger patients (P < 0,001), The elderly support equality of care with re
lation to age more strongly than the young. However, in a situation of reso
urce limitation, inequality favoring the young is opposed less strongly by
the elderly than by the young. Social desirability bias may have influenced
this finding, All cohorts reported symptom palliation to be of secondary i
mportance to treatments offering a possibility of cure (P = 0.26), The elde
rly believe more strongly that doctors should make management decisions (P
< 0.001).
Conclusion. The elderly desire radical surgery and disease cure as strongly
as the young. They are less likely to question their doctors' decisions an
d are therefore vulnerable to physicians' age bias. There is no justificati
on for rationing care on the basis of chronological age. (C) 2001 Academic
Press.