Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds
R. Menkveld et al., Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds, HUM REPR, 16(6), 2001, pp. 1165-1171
In this study, the semen analysis results of a fertile population were comp
ared with those from a subfertile population, in order to establish normal
cut-off values for the standard semen parameters with the aid of receiver o
perating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The fertile group comprised h
ealthy males (n = 107) without any history of fertility problems, the partn
ers of whom had had a spontaneous pregnancy within one year of unprotected
intercourse and were pregnant at the time of the male's inclusion into the
study, A total of 103 males from couples attending the infertility clinic,
and with an initial sperm count of < 20 x 10(6)/ml were recruited to form t
he subfertile population. The best discriminating parameter between the two
populations was sperm morphology evaluated according to WHO criteria at a
cut-off point of 31% normal spermatozoa. The other cut-off values were at 8
% for the acrosome index, 45% for motility, and 4% normal spermatozoa for s
trict criteria. Recalculating the ROC curve cut-off values based on an assu
med 50% prevalence of subfertility in an assisted reproductive setting, the
cut-off points were reduced to 21% and 3% normal spermatozoa for WHO and s
trict criteria respectively. For motility, the new cut-off value was at 20%
motile spermatozoa, for motility quality at 3.5 (on a scale of 1-6), the a
crosome index at 3% normal acrosomes, and the teratozoospermia index at 2.0
9.