Gs. Merrick et al., A comparison of radiation dose to the bulb of the penis in men with and without prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction, INT J RAD O, 50(3), 2001, pp. 597-604
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the relationship between the radiation
dose to the bulb of the penis and the development of erectile dysfunction
(ED) in patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy without extern
al beam radiation therapy.
Methods and Materials: Twenty-three men who developed ED after transperinea
l ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy for clinical T1/T2 ade
nocarcinoma of the prostate gland were paired with 23 similar men who maint
ained potency after implantation. Potency was defined as an erection suffic
ient for vaginal penetration. The mean and median follow-up for the entire
group was 34.6 +/- 13.7 months and 32.8 months, respectively. Patients were
implanted with either I-125 (145 Gy TG-43) or Pd-103 (115 Gy, pre-NIST-99)
, No patient received external beam radiation therapy either before or afte
r brachytherapy, The bulb of the penis was outlined at 0.5-cm intervals on
the Day 0 postimplant CT scan. The radiation dose distribution to the bulb
of the penis was defined in terms of the minimal dose delivered to 25%, 50%
, 70%, 75%, 90%, and 95% of the bulb (D-25, D-50, D-70, D-75, D-90, and D-9
5).
Results: The radiation dose delivered to the bulb of the penis in men with
postbrachytherapy-induced ED was statistically greater for all evaluated do
simetric parameters (D-25, D-50, D-70, D-75, D-90, and D-95). Multivariate
analysis indicated that dose to the bulb of the penis and patient age at th
e time of implant were predictive of postimplant ED, whereas choice of isot
ope had no effect. Among potent patients, 19/23 had D-50 less than or equal
to 40% of prescribed minimal peripheral dose, whereas for the impotent pat
ients, 19/23 had D-50 > 40% of the minimal peripheral dose. Of the impotent
patients, 17 utilized sildenafil, with 15 experiencing a favorable respons
e (88%).
Conclusion: Our data suggest that prostate brachytherapy-induced impotence
is highly correlated with the radiation dose delivered to the bulb of the p
enis. With Day 0 dosimetric evaluation, the radiation dose delivered to 50%
of the bulb of the penis should be maintained at 50 Gy or less to maximize
post-treatment potency. Fortunately, the majority of the brachytherapy-ind
uced ED population responds favorably to sildenafil. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scie
nce Inc.