A comparison of radiation dose to the bulb of the penis in men with and without prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction

Citation
Gs. Merrick et al., A comparison of radiation dose to the bulb of the penis in men with and without prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction, INT J RAD O, 50(3), 2001, pp. 597-604
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
597 - 604
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(20010701)50:3<597:ACORDT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the relationship between the radiation dose to the bulb of the penis and the development of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy without extern al beam radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: Twenty-three men who developed ED after transperinea l ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy for clinical T1/T2 ade nocarcinoma of the prostate gland were paired with 23 similar men who maint ained potency after implantation. Potency was defined as an erection suffic ient for vaginal penetration. The mean and median follow-up for the entire group was 34.6 +/- 13.7 months and 32.8 months, respectively. Patients were implanted with either I-125 (145 Gy TG-43) or Pd-103 (115 Gy, pre-NIST-99) , No patient received external beam radiation therapy either before or afte r brachytherapy, The bulb of the penis was outlined at 0.5-cm intervals on the Day 0 postimplant CT scan. The radiation dose distribution to the bulb of the penis was defined in terms of the minimal dose delivered to 25%, 50% , 70%, 75%, 90%, and 95% of the bulb (D-25, D-50, D-70, D-75, D-90, and D-9 5). Results: The radiation dose delivered to the bulb of the penis in men with postbrachytherapy-induced ED was statistically greater for all evaluated do simetric parameters (D-25, D-50, D-70, D-75, D-90, and D-95). Multivariate analysis indicated that dose to the bulb of the penis and patient age at th e time of implant were predictive of postimplant ED, whereas choice of isot ope had no effect. Among potent patients, 19/23 had D-50 less than or equal to 40% of prescribed minimal peripheral dose, whereas for the impotent pat ients, 19/23 had D-50 > 40% of the minimal peripheral dose. Of the impotent patients, 17 utilized sildenafil, with 15 experiencing a favorable respons e (88%). Conclusion: Our data suggest that prostate brachytherapy-induced impotence is highly correlated with the radiation dose delivered to the bulb of the p enis. With Day 0 dosimetric evaluation, the radiation dose delivered to 50% of the bulb of the penis should be maintained at 50 Gy or less to maximize post-treatment potency. Fortunately, the majority of the brachytherapy-ind uced ED population responds favorably to sildenafil. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scie nce Inc.