W. Horwitz et al., Examination of proficiency and control recovery data from analyses for pesticide residues in food: Sources of variability, J AOAC INT, 84(3), 2001, pp. 919-935
We examined a number of large proficiency and control databases supporting
the values reported for pesticide residues in agricultural commodities at f
ractions of a part per million (mg/kg), The average recovery from > 100 000
recovery records in 13 databases was 94%. The overall average single-value
relative standard deviation (RSD) of the reported recoveries was 17% at a
mean concentration (C) of about 10(-7) (0.1 mg/kg), The average apparent HO
RRAT value (RSD found/RSDR predicted from the Horwitz formula [2*C-0.1505])
was 0.8. Analysis of variance indicated that about 60-70% of the variance
could not be associated with any particular factor or combination of factor
s-analyte, commodity, method, laboratory, concentration, database, or their
interactions. The most predominant factor, analyte, and its third-order in
teraction with laboratory and concentration contributed most of the assigna
ble variance. These findings suggested that most of the variability of trac
e analysis for pesticide residues is "random" in the sense of being inheren
t and not assignable to specific factor fluctuations.