Recent research findings suggest that reinforcing stimuli may be differenti
ally effective as response requirements increase. We extended this line of
research by evaluating responding under increasing schedule requirements vi
a progressive-ratio schedules and behavioral economic analyses. The differe
ntial effectiveness of preferred stimuli in treating destructive behavior m
aintained by automatic reinforcement also was examined. Results showed that
one of two stimuli was associated with more responding under increasing sc
hedule requirements for the 4 participants. Furthermore, stimuli associated
with more responding under increasing schedule requirements generally were
more effective in creating destructive behavior chan stimuli associated wi
th less responding. These data suggest that progressive-ratio schedules and
behavioral economic analyses may be useful for developing a new technology
for reinforcer identification. From a clinical perspective, these results
suggest that two reinforcers may be similarly effective for low-effort task
s and differentially effective for high-effort casks.