Current images portray childhood as primarily a time of play and learning,
de-emphasizing children's economic contributions and relegating them, like
women, to the less-visible realm of the home. Ethnographic and historic lit
erature amply demonstrates that age categories are constructs and, thus, ex
hibit considerable temporal and cross-cultural variability. Nevertheless, a
rchaeologists have tended to ignore prehistoric children, perhaps viewing t
hem as only peripheral to control research concerns, or to treat them stere
otypically. The archaeological record provides opportunities for the explor
ation of numerous aspects of childhood and archaeologists are encouraged to
respond to the challenge.