Posterior cruciate-sacrificing versus posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty - A study of clinical and functional outcomes in matched patients
Ci. Title et al., Posterior cruciate-sacrificing versus posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty - A study of clinical and functional outcomes in matched patients, J ARTHROPLA, 16(4), 2001, pp. 409-414
Since the introduction of the Total Condylar Prosthesis (TCP) in 1974, conc
omitant improvements in surgical technique and prosthetic design have occur
red. The individual effects of each of these variables have not been invest
igated, however. This study evaluates 2 different knee designs using the sa
me operative technique by a single surgeon. All primary total knee arthropl
asties performed between 1986 and 1989 were entered into a database of 2 co
horts, TCP and Press Fit Condylar (PFC) knees, matched fur age, gender, bod
y weight, and diagnosis. Follow-up data within 12 months of each other were
used, evaluating patients clinically and using a self-administered questio
nnaire. In each cohort, 74 knees were matched by these criteria. Follow-up
time was 4.04 and 4.45 years for the TCP and PFC cohorts. Range of motion a
veraged 107 degrees and 112 degrees for the TCP and PFC cohorts. This diffe
rence was statistically significant. Total knee score and functional score
im proved significantly. Anterior knee pain was present in 9 TCP and 3 PFC
knees. Lateral release was performed in 30 TCP and 18 PFC knees. The PFC sh
owed an advantage in ROM, stair function, anterior knee pain, and use of la
teral release. Both designs showed comparable pain relief and walking abili
ty.