Nb. Ingleby, Comments on "A statistical determination of the random observational errors present in voluntary observing ships' meteorological reports'', J ATMOSP OC, 18(6), 2001, pp. 1102-1107
The accuracy achievable for surface ship pressure reports and the sources o
f error in them are discussed. In The Met Office numerical weather predicti
on (NWP) system the error is estimated as 1 hPa, whereas Kent et al. calcul
ated a figure of about 2.3 hPa. There are a number of reasons for this disc
repancy, but the main one is that quality control using short-range forecas
ts is much better at detecting gross errors in the reports than are climato
logical checks. Statistics from the Met Office NWP system are presented for
comparison of pressure and other atmospheric variables. Other variables sh
ow much less discrepancy than pressure because, relative to observation err
or, they have a smaller climatological range. Both sets of statistics show
larger air temperature errors at high latitudes/low temperatures.