Development of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I or II antibodies following left ventricular assist device implantation: Effects on subsequent allograft rejection and survival
Fd. Pagani et al., Development of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I or II antibodies following left ventricular assist device implantation: Effects on subsequent allograft rejection and survival, J HEART LUN, 20(6), 2001, pp. 646-653
Background: Previous reports have indicated that antibodies to HLA class I
or II antigens develop in approximately 60% of patients following left: ven
tricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, subsequent rates of allograft r
ejection are higher, and survival is adversely affected.
Methods: We performed an analysis of the incidence of antibody development
to HLA class I or II antigens by panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening fo
llowing implantation of the HeartMate LVAD in 38 patients from October 1, 1
996 to March 1, 2000 (6 LVAD deaths excluded from study). The occurrence of
vascular or cellular rejection of International Society of Heart and Lung
Transplantation grade greater than or equal to 3A, as determined by endomyo
cardial biopsy following heart transplantation (HTX), were compared for pat
ients with (n = 32, LVAD group) or without (n = 68, control group) preopera
tive LVAD support.
Results: After LVAD implantation, 9 patients (28%) in the LVAD group develo
ped IgG antibodies to class I (n = 3), class II (n = 5), or both antigens (
n = 1) with PRA > 10%. The remaining 23 patients (72%) had either no detect
able IgG antibody development or IgG antibody development with PRA < 10%. A
t the time of HTX, only 4 patients in the LVAD group had persistent PRA > 1
0%. Only 3 patients (4%) in the control group had PRA > 10% at the time of
HTX. The incidence of patients free from rejection at 6 and 12 months was 6
2% and 44% for the control group, and 49%, and 40% for the LVAD group, resp
ectively (p not significant). The mean linearized rate plus or minus standa
rd deviation of allograft rejection from 0 to 6 months and 7 to 12 months w
as 0.13 +/- 0.21 and 0.09 +/- 0.14 episodes a month, respectively, for pati
ents with no LVAD support, and 0.17 +/- .25 and 0.06 +/- 0.1 episodes a mon
th, respectively, for those with LVAD support (p = not significant). Post-t
ransplantation survival at 1 and 2 years was 90% and 90%, respectively, for
the control group, and 97% and 92%, respectively, for the LVAD group (p no
t significant).
Conclusion: Patients with LVAD support before HTX do not appear to be at in
creased risk for significant allograft rejection in the first year or for d
eath within the first 2 years after transplantation.