Gr. Willsky et al., Effect of vanadium(IV) compounds in the treatment of diabetes: in vivo andin vitro studies with vanadyl sulfate and bis(maltolato)oxovandium(IV), J INORG BIO, 85(1), 2001, pp. 33-42
Vanadyl sulfate (VOSO4) was given orally to 16 subjects with type 2 diabete
s mellitus for 6 weeks at a dose of 25, 50, or 100 mg vanadium (V) daily [G
oldfine et al., Metabolism 49 (2000) 1-12]. Elemental V was determined by g
raphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). There was no correl
ation of V in serum with clinical response, determined by reduction of mean
fasting blood glucose or increased insulin sensitivity during euglycemic c
lamp. To investigate the effect of administering a coordinated V, plasma gl
ucose levels were determined in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats
treated with the salt (VOSO4) or the coordinated V compound bis(maltolato)o
xovandium(IV) (abbreviated as VO(malto)(2)) administered by intraperitoneal
(i.p.) injection. There was no relationship of blood V concentration with
plasma glucose levels in the animals treated with VOSO4, similar to our hum
an diabetic patients. However, with VO(malto)(2) treatment, animals with lo
w plasma glucose tended to have high blood V. To determine if V binding to
serum proteins could diminish biologically active serum V, binding of both
VOSO4 and VO(malto)(2) to human serum albumin (HSA), human apoTransferrin (
apoHTf) and pig immunoglobulin (IgG) was studied with EPR spectroscopy. Bot
h VOSO4 and VO(malto)(2) bound to HSA and apoHTf forming different V-protei
n complexes, while neither V compound bound to the IgG. VOSO4 and VO(malto)
(2) showed differences when levels of plasma glucose and blood V in diabeti
c rodents were compared, and in the formation of V-protein complexes with a
bundant serum proteins. These data suggest that binding of V compounds to l
igands in blood, such as proteins, may affect the available pool of V for b
iological effects. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.