Failure of right precordial electrocardiography during stress testing to identify coronary artery disease

Citation
S. Bokhari et al., Failure of right precordial electrocardiography during stress testing to identify coronary artery disease, J NUCL CARD, 8(3), 2001, pp. 325-331
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
10713581 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
325 - 331
Database
ISI
SICI code
1071-3581(200105/06)8:3<325:FORPED>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background, It has been reported that the use of right precordial leads res ults in the same diagnostic accuracy as thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study w as to evaluate the utility of right precordial leads in the detection of CA D. Methods and Results, We evaluated 900 consecutive patients (514 men, 386 wo men) ranging in age from 39 to 84 years (mean +/- SD, 64 +/- 11 Sears). Sev en hundred forty patients underwent treadmill exercise testing, and 160 und erwent pharmacologic stress testing for the diagnosis of chest pain or dysp nea, All received either TI-201 or technetium-99m sestamibi during stress. During stress testing, the ECG was recorded every minute with 12 limb and l eft precordial leads acid 3 right precordial leads (V3R, V4R, and V5R), The electrocardiogram was considered positive when the ST segment was either e levated or depressed by at least 0.1 mV at 80 ms after the J point, and res ults were also compared with single photon emission computed tomography myo cardial perfusion imaging results. Of the 900 patients, 158 had significant positive changes in the limb or left precordial leads. Only 4 patients had positive changes in the right precordial leads (Fisher exact test, P < .00 1). Of the patients who had positive electrocardiographic changes, 95 (60%) had abnormal myocardial perfusion scans, with 91 in patients with normal r ight precordial leads. All 4 patients with ischemic changes in the right pr ecordial leads had abnormal scans, but the left leads were also positive. T hree hundred seventy-three of 900 patients (41%) had abnormal scans with no electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia, Conclusions. Our experience is far different than that published and sugges ts that the use of right precordial leads during stress testing fails to pr ovide the same diagnostic accuracy as either the standard left-sided electr ocardiography or myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of CAD.