Rsgm. Perez et al., Treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS type 1): A research synthesis of 21 randomized clinical trials, J PAIN SYMP, 21(6), 2001, pp. 511-526
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Neurosciences & Behavoir
A blinded meta analysis teas performed on randomized clinical trials (RCT)
on the medicinal treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (complex regiona
l pain. syndrome type I) to assess the methodological quality and quantify
the analgesic effect of treatments by calculating individual and summary ef
fect sizes. The internal validity of 21 RCTs was investigated and the quali
ty weighted summary effect size was calculated using a fixed effect model (
Glass Delta). The methodological quality ranged from moderate to good (aver
age 46%). Differences were found between the trials in inclusion/exclusion
criteria, treatment methods, duration of treatments and trials, and measure
ment instruments. Statistical analysis was possible for four subgroups; one
evaluating the analgesic effects of sympathetic suppressors in general (n
= 12), one subgroup concerning the analgesic effects of guanethidine (n = 6
), one investigating the analgesic effect of intravenous regional sympathet
ic blocks (n = 9), and one subgroup (n = 5) evaluating the analgesic effect
of calcitonin. Except for the calcitonin subgroup (P = 0.002), the quality
-weighted summary effect size of these subgroups were not significant. No s
ignificant analgesic effect by sympathetic suppressing agents could be esta
blished. Calcitonin seems to Provide effective pain relief in reflex sympat
hetic dystrophy patients. The results of the present study show that weight
ing methodological quality influences the magnitude of the effect sizes of
specific treatment methods. Future studies should control for methodologica
l quality. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001: 21:511-526 (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Reli
ef Committee, 2001.