Cs. Stewart et al., Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique afterprevious negative sextant biopsies, J UROL, 166(1), 2001, pp. 86-91
Purpose: We hypothesized that markedly increasing the number of cores obtai
ned during prostate needle biopsy may improve the cancer detection rate in
men with persistent indications for repeat biopsy.
Materials and Methods: We performed saturation ultrasound guided transrecta
l prostate needle biopsy in 224 men under anesthesia in an outpatient surgi
cal setting in whom previous negative biopsies had been performed in the of
fice. The mean number of previous sextant biopsy sessions plus or minus sta
ndard deviation before saturation biopsy was 1.8 (range 1 to 7). A mean of
23 saturation biopsy cores (range 14 to 45) were distributed throughout the
whole prostate, including the peripheral, medial and anterior regions. ind
ications for repeat biopsy were persistent elevated serum prostate specific
antigen (PSA) in 108 cases, persistent elevated PSA and abnormal rectal ex
amination in 27, persistent abnormal rectal examination in 4, high grade pr
ostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the previous biopsy in 64 and atypia i
n the previous biopsy in 21.
Results: Cancer was detected in 77 of 224 patients (34%). The number of pre
vious negative sextant biopsies was not predictive of subsequent cancer det
ection by saturation biopsy. Median PSA was 8.7 ng./ml. and median PSA velo
city was 0.63 ng./ml, yearly. Of the 77 patients in whom cancer was detecte
d radical prostatectomy was performed in 52. Pathological stage was pT2 in
48 patients and pT3 in 4, while Gleason score was 4 to 5, 6 to 7 and 8 in 5
, 46 and 1, respectively. At prostatectomy median cancer volume was 1.04 cc
and 85.7% of removed tumors were clinically significant, assuming a 3-year
doubling time. The overall complication rate for saturation needle biopsy
was 12% and hematuria requiring hospital admission was the most common even
t.
Conclusions: Saturation needle biopsy of the prostate is a useful diagnosti
c technique in men at risk for prostate cancer with previous negative offic
e biopsies. This technique allows adequate sampling of the whole prostate g
land and has a detection rate of 34% in this cohort of patients.