A. Tubaro et al., A prospective study of the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, J UROL, 166(1), 2001, pp. 172-176
Purpose: We investigate the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical
prostatectomy, and the change in bladder wall thickness after surgery.
Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective 1 center study of 32 cons
ecutive patients who underwent transvesical prostatectomy from December 199
6 to March 1997 for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large prostate volume
, who were followed for I year. Pressure flow study and transrectal sonogra
phy were performed at baseline and repeated at 6 months. Bladder wall thick
ness was measured at baseline and regular intervals postoperatively. A morb
idity questionnaire was completed during the first 6 weeks after surgery.
Results: An average of 63 gm. prostate adenoma were enucleated at surgery.
An indwelling catheter was required for an average plus or minus standard d
eviation of 5.4 +/- 2.6 days after treatment. The International Prostate Sy
mptom Score decreased from 19.9 +/- 4.4 to 1.5 +/- 2.7 and the quality of l
ife score decreased from 4.9 +/- 1.0 to 0.2 +/- 0.4 at year 1, respectively
. Maximum flow rate improved from 9.1 +/- 5.3 to 29.0 +/- 8.9 ml. per secon
d. Residual urine decreased from 128 +/- 113 to 8 +/- 18 ml. Before surgery
30 patients had obstruction and 2 were in the equivocal zone of the Intern
ational Continence Society nomogram. At 6 months after prostatectomy 30 pat
ients did not have obstruction, and 2 who were subsequently operated on for
bladder neck sclerosis were equivocal and had obstruction, respectively. N
o patient had significant postoperative bleeding and no heterologous blood
transfusions were required. There were 4 men who had urinary tract; infecti
on and 1 who had wound infection. A slight decrease in erectile function wa
s observed 6 weeks postoperatively, and no change in patient libido and qua
lity of sex life was reported. The total complication rate was 31.3%. The b
ladder was unstable in 7 men before and 3 after surgery. A significant decr
ease in bladder wall thickness was observed from 5.2 +/- 0.7 at baseline to
2.9 +/- 0.9 mm. at year 1 postoperatively.
Conclusions: Our study confirms the excellent clinical outcome of transvesi
cal prostatectomy, and rapid improvement of most subjective and objective p
arameters during the 4 weeks after surgery. Bladder hypertrophy appears to
be significantly reduced after prostate surgery. The urodynamic results in
patients who underwent open surgery probably represent the maximum obtainab
le relief of obstruction and should be considered the reference standard to
which all other treatments, including transurethral resection, should aspi
re.