Gelation mechanism of thermoreversible gels of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and its blends with poly(methyl acrylate) in diethyl azelate

Citation
Ak. Dikshit et Ak. Nandi, Gelation mechanism of thermoreversible gels of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and its blends with poly(methyl acrylate) in diethyl azelate, LANGMUIR, 17(12), 2001, pp. 3607-3615
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
LANGMUIR
ISSN journal
07437463 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
3607 - 3615
Database
ISI
SICI code
0743-7463(20010612)17:12<3607:GMOTGO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVF2) and its blends with poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) produce thermoreversible gels in diethyl azelate. SEM studies indicat e a fibrillar network structure, and WAXS/FTIR studies indicate the presenc e of alpha -polymorphic crystals of PVF2 in the gels. Some newer X-ray diff raction peaks are observed in the dried gels than those in the melt-crystal lized PVF2 samples, and the intensity ratios (I(hkl)degrees /I(Il0)degrees) Of the diffraction peaks of the dried gels are also different from those o f the melt-crystallized sample. The gelation rates of these systems are mea sured by the test tube tilting method. At a particular isothermal temperatu re the gelation rates of the blends decrease and the critical gelation conc entrations (C-t=alpha*,) of the blends increase with an increase in PMA con centration. In terms of PVF2 concentration the C-t=alpha* values are also h igher for the blends than that of the pure PVF2 at a given gelation tempera ture. The (t(gel)(-1)) has been analyzed from the equation t(gel)(-1) infin ity f(C)f(T). At a constant temperature analysis gelation rate (t(gel)-1 of the concentration function f(C) indicates three-dimensional percolation is a suitable model for gelation of both PVF2 and its blends, supporting that blending does not alter the macroscopic mechanism. The microscopic mechani sm, determined from f(T), is however affected due to blending. The gelation process is considered as a two-step process: coil --> TGTG conformer --> f ibrillar crystallization (gelation). The free energy of activation (DeltaF) of the conformational ordering increases, and the free energy of formation of the critical size nucleus (DeltaG*) decreases with increasing PMA conce ntration of the blend. A possible explanation for this difference has been offered. A comparison of DeltaF and DeltaG*: of the two processes indicates that transformation of the coil --> TGTG conformer is the rate-determining step of the gelation process for all the samples. The lower gelation rate of the blends may be due to its increased DeltaF value.