Laboratory protocol for exercise asthma to evaluate salbutamol given by two devices

Purpose: As new delivery devices and formulations are being introduced for drugs given by inhalation, there is a need to evaluate their equivalence wi th old preparations. One way to do this is to investigate their equivalence in protecting from exercise-induced asthma (EIA). Methods: We used a proto col for EIA to compare the protective effect of salbutamol delivered by the pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and the new Diskus dry powder devi ce. Twenty-seven asthmatic subjects with moderately severe EIA completed an exercise test on four separate days at two study centers. Exercise was per formed by cycling for 8 min while inhaling dry air (0% RH, 20-24 degreesC). The target workload in W was predicted as (53.76 x predicted FEV1) - 11.07 and 95% of this target was achieved at 4 min of exercise. This target was chosen in order to achieve ventilation between 50 and 60% of predicted maxi mum in the last 4 min. Results: There was no significant difference in the workload, ventilation, or heart rate achieved on the study days. The severi ty of EIA was measured as the % fall in FEV1. EIA severity was similar on t he placebo and control day and the coefficient of variation was 19.4%. The mean +/- SD % fall on the control, placebo, salbutamol by Diskus, and pMDI were 42.0% +/- 15, 39.4% +/- 17.6, 13.4% +/- 13.2, and 8.5% +/- 13.8, respe ctively. Salbutamol significantly inhibited the % fall in FEV1 after exerci se, and there was no difference between the preparations. Conclusion: The p rotocol described here is suitable for evaluating equivalence of salbutamol preparations in protecting against EIA and could be used to evaluate the p rotective effect of other medications.