An assessment of the spectrum of disability and handicap in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study

Citation
Gv. Mcdonnell et Sa. Hawkins, An assessment of the spectrum of disability and handicap in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study, MULT SCLER, 7(2), 2001, pp. 111-117
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
ISSN journal
13524585 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
111 - 117
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-4585(200104)7:2<111:AAOTSO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objectives: To establish the spectrum of disability and handicap in a popul ation based sample of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Background: Much kn owledge exists about the epidemiology of MS but, despite its importance for health and social service planning there remains relatively little data on the extent and nature of disability and handicap in this population. Metho ds: In a prevalence study in the north-east of N. Ireland, 288 patients (Po ser criteria) were identified. Disability and handicap were assessed using the Incapacity Status Scale and Environmental Status Scale of the Minimal R ecord of Disability for MS. Results: Both scales were completed for 248 (86 %) of patients. Just 71 (29%) are fully independent in all basic ADL's of b athing, dressing grooming and feeding. Fifty-seven (23%) are unable to clim b a flight of stairs and 102 (42%) acknowledge problems with sexual functio n. Sixty-one (25%) were working essentially full-time and 53 (21%) had no e xternal financial support. Forty-five (18%) had changed residence due to MS , 12 (5%) were institutionalised and 86 (35%) required assistance for at le ast 1 h/day with ADL's. Eighty-one (33%) were unable to drive a car or use public transport. Forty-two (17%) access community services for at least 1 h/day on average. Conclusions: This data gives a clear indication of the co nsiderable range of basic health and social issues in a typical MS communit y. Further work is required to establish patient perceptions of the adequac y of care provision and whether standards of care for MS patients are being met.