The relation between objective and subjective impairment in cognitive function among multiple sclerosis patients - the role of depression

Citation
Y. Maor et al., The relation between objective and subjective impairment in cognitive function among multiple sclerosis patients - the role of depression, MULT SCLER, 7(2), 2001, pp. 131-135
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
ISSN journal
13524585 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
131 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-4585(200104)7:2<131:TRBOAS>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relations between perceived cognitive function a nd objective cognitive deficit and to assess variables affecting perceived cognitive function among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods: A cross sectional study of patients with MS. All patients were interviewed and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was determined. The dependen t variables were four items assessing perceived concentration and thinking, attention, memory, and whether others have noticed memory or concentration problems. The explanatory variables were age, sex, duration of disease, nu mber of relapses in the last 2 years, EDSS score, depressive symptoms score (CES-D) and the domains of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examinatio n (NCSE) assessing cognitive performance. Bivariate and then multivariate a nalysis were performed. Results: One hundred and sixty-one MS patients were included. Mean age was 44.2 years (s.d. 11.3 years), mean EDSS score was 4 .86 (s.d. 1.93). Seventy-two per cent of the patients had objective cogniti ve impairment and 51% reported decreased perceived cognitive function. In a ll models assessing perceived cognitive function rye could explain only a s mall part of the variance (R-2 ranged between 18-26%). In ah these models d epressive symptoms explained the highest portion of the variance (partial R -2 ranging between 13-26%). The only domain of the NCSE that entered some o f the models was calculation (partial R2 ranging between 3-7%). Conclusions : These findings emphasize the gap between objective and subjective assessm ent of cognitive function and the high correlation between perceived cognit ive deficit and depressive symptoms.