Mathematical models suggest that reproducing females may benefit by faculta
tively adjusting their relative investment into sons vs, daughters, in resp
onse to population-wide shifts in operational sex ratio (OSR). Our field st
udies on viviparous alpine skinks (Niveoscincus microlepidotus) document su
ch a ease, whereby among- and within-year shifts in OSR mere followed by sh
ifts in sex allocation. When adult males were relatively scarce, females pr
oduced male-biased litters and larger sons than daughters. The reverse was
true when adult males were relatively more common. That is, females that we
re courted and mated by few males produced mainly sons (and these were larg
er than daughters), whereas females that were courted and mated by many mal
es produced mainly daughters (and these were larger than sons). Maternal bo
dy size and condition also covaried with sex allocation, and the shifting p
attern of sexual size dimorphism at birth may reflect these correlated effe
cts rather than a discrete component of an evolved sex-allocation strategy.