The ideal follow-up program for anal canal cancer remains unclear and contr
oversial. We hereby describe an extensive follow-up program for anal canal
carcinoma in order to evaluate which examinations and which diagnostic tech
niques really had impact on survival and management. We evaluated 25 patien
ts with anal canal carcinoma. Local excision (LE) was performed in 5 patien
ts, radiochemotherapy (RCT) in 13, radiochemotherapy and local excision (RC
TE) in 7. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 years (range 20 months-ii years). The
follow-up program included clinical examination, serum tumor markers evalu
ation, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), anoscopy with either mucosal or
by Tru-cut needle multiple biopsies, standard chest X-ray and hepatic-ingui
nal ultrasonography, endoanal magnetic resonance imaging and in some cases
total-body skeletal scintigraphy. A large multicentered randomized and pros
pective trial is surely lacking and should be undertaken as soon as possibl
e. Our results suggest that an effective local control, rather than a highe
r survival is the reachable goal at present for anal canal carcinomas. Howe
ver, further steps should be made to achieve better results. After this exp
erience we propose a more semplified follow-up protocol which consists in p
erforming only rectal examination, endoscopy, Tru-cut needle biopsies and T
RUS for local control and inguinal ultrasound and TC to evidence distant me
tastases.