Sr. Paterson et Rh. Vernon, Inclusion trail patterns in porphyrohlasts from the Foothills Terrane, California: a record of orogenesis or local strain heterogeneity?, J METAMORPH, 19(4), 2001, pp. 351-372
A major problem with the current use of porphyroblast-matrix microstructura
l relationships to infer orogenic histories, such as multiple orthogonal or
ogenic events, is that other evidence for these events is typically lacking
. For example, a comparison of regional relationships and local structures
formed in and adjacent to porphyroblasts present in contact aureoles in the
Foothills Terrane, Sierra Nevada, California, shows that: (1) except in sh
ear zones, contact aureoles and local zones along lithological contacts, th
e Foothills Terrane has a single regional cleavage, although locally formed
by multiple processes; (2) the regional cleavage and locally developed por
phyroblast inclusion trails have variable orientations, and neither dataset
supports the formation of dominantly subhorizontal and subvertical cleavag
es in this orogen; (3) structural and metamorphic heterogeneities occur at
all scales and can markedly affect inclusion trail patterns in porphyroblas
ts; (4) complex porphyroblast growth features and internal inclusion trail
patterns can form in porphyroblasts that grow during short time intervals i
n contact aureoles, indicating that local complexity in porphyroblasts does
not imply regional complexity. Because of these conclusions, multiple data
sets, rather than data acquired only from porphyroblasts, should be conside
red when attempting to understand the evolution of orogens. Furthermore, us
ing microstructural information preserved only in porphyroblasts to infer o
rogenic processes and plate motions is generally unjustified.