Fl. Jones et P. Smith, Diversity and commonality in national identities: an exploratory analysis of cross-national patterns, J SOCIOL, 37(1), 2001, pp. 45-63
Issues of boundary maintenance are implicit in all studies of national iden
tity. By definition, national communities consist of those who are included
but surrounded (literally or metaphorically) by those who are excluded. Mo
st extant research on national identity explores criteria for national memb
ership largely in terms of official or public definitions described, for ex
ample, in citizenship and immigration laws or in texts of popular culture.
We know much less about how ordinary people in various nations reason about
these issues. An analysis of cross-national (N = 23) survey data from the
1995 International Social Science Program reveals a core pattern in most of
the countries studied. Respondents were asked how important various criter
ia were in being 'truly' a member of a particular nation. Exploratory facto
r analysis shows that these items cluster in terms of two underlying dimens
ions. Ascriptive/objectivist criteria relating to birth, religion and resid
ence can be distinguished from civic/voluntarist criteria relating to subje
ctive feelings of membership and belief in core institutions. In most natio
ns the ascriptive/objectivist dimension of national identity was more promi
nent than the subjective civic/voluntarist dimension. Taken overall, these
findings suggest an unanticipated homogeneity in the ways that citizens aro
und the world think about national identity. To the extent that these dimen
sions also mirror the well-known distinction between ethnic and civic natio
nal identification, they suggest that the former remains robust despite glo
balization, mass migration and cultural pluralism. Throughout the world off
icial definitions of national identification have tended to shift towards a
civic model. Yet citizens remain remarkably traditional in outlook. A task
for future research is to investigate the macrosociological forces that pr
oduce both commonality and difference in the core patterns we have identifi
ed.