OBJECTIVES: To determine whether prompted voiding (PV) is effective for nig
httime urinary incontinence in nursing home (NH) residents and whether resi
dents who respond well to daytime PV also respond well at night.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
SETTING: Four community NHs.
PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one long-stay incontinent NH residents of mean age 88 y
ears, 75% female.
MEASUREMENTS: The percentage of hourly checks for wetness and the appropria
te toileting rate (continent voids divided by total voids) were measured du
ring 3 days (7 a.m.-7 p.m.) of PV, and for an average of 5 nights (7 p.m.-7
a.m., during which a modified PV protocol, designed to be minimally disrup
tive to sleep, was carried out.
RESULTS: Fourteen residents (23%) responded well to daytime PV, with averag
e wetness and appropriate toileting rates of 5% and 73%, respectively. In t
he group as a whole, nighttime PV was not effective, with wetness and appro
priate toileting rates of 49% and 18%, respectively. Among those who respon
ded well to daytime PV, wetness rates during nighttime PV remained signific
antly higher than during the day (24% vs 5%; P =.000), and nighttime approp
riate toileting rates were significantly lower (39% vs 73%; P = .002). The
poor response rate at night was primarily observed between 10 p.m. and 6 a.
m.
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of incontinent NH residents, nighttime PV, even
when carried out so as to minimize sleep disruption, was not an effective
intervention. Although residents who responded well to daytime PV responded
better to nighttime PV than those who did not respond to da) time PV, thei
r wetness rates remained relatively high and their appropriate toileting ra
tes were low. These data suggest that routine nighttime toileting pro- gram
s should not be carried out for the majority of incontinent NH residents. I
nstead, individualized care based on resident's preferences, willingness to
toilet at night, and sleep patterns should be emphasized.