Factors associated with home versus institutional death among cancer patients in Connecticut

Citation
Wt. Gallo et al., Factors associated with home versus institutional death among cancer patients in Connecticut, J AM GER SO, 49(6), 2001, pp. 771-777
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00028614 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
771 - 777
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8614(200106)49:6<771:FAWHVI>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between home death and a set of demo graphic, disease-related, and health-resource factors among individuals who died of cancer. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: All adult deaths from cancer in Connecticut during 1994. PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand eight hundred and thirteen individuals who met a ll of the following criteria: died of a cancer-related cause in 1994, had p reviously been diagnosed with cancer in Connecticut, and were age 18 and ol der at the time of death. MEASUREMENT: Site of death. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of the study sample died at home, 42% died in a hospital, 17% died in a nursing home, and 11% died in an inpatient hospic e facility. Multivariate analysis indicated that demographic characteristic s (being married, female, white, and residing in a higher income area), dis ease-related factors (type of cancer, longer survival postdiagnosis), and h ealth-resource factors (greater availability of hospice providers, less ava ilability of hospital beds) were associated with dying at home rather than in a hospital or inpatient hospice. CONCLUSIONS: The implications of this study for clinical practice and healt h planning are considerable. The findings identify groups (men, unmarried i ndividuals, and those living in lower income areas) at higher risk for inst itutionalized death-groups that may be targeted for possible interventions to promote home death when home death is preferred by patients and their fa milies. Further, the findings suggest that site of death is influenced by a vailable health-system resources. Thus, if home death is to be supported, t he relative availability of hospital beds and hospice providers may be an e ffective policy tool for promoting home death.